天然产物研究与开发 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 368-383.doi: 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2026.2.014 cstr: 32307.14.1001-6880.2026.2.014

• 开发研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

夏枯草膏制备过程不同阶段关键物质量值传递研究

杜中华1,徐  雷1,胡志梅1,张  明1,夏恒建2,王圣军2,叶利春3,4*,石召华4,5*   

  1. 1湖北中医药大学药学院,武汉 430065;2李时珍医药集团有限公司,武汉 435300;3湖北中医药大学中医学院;4湖北时珍实验室;5湖北中医药大学中药资源与中药复方教育部重点实验室,武汉 430065
  • 出版日期:2026-02-26 发布日期:2026-02-25
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省科技计划项目重大科技专项(2024BCA002);湖北省自然科学基金(2023AFD120);湖北省教育厅科学研究计划青年人才项目(Q20232002);湖北省高等学校优秀中青年科技创新团队计划(T2023014)

Quantitative value transfer of key substances at different stages of the preparation process of Prunellae Spica ointment

DU Zhong-hua1,XU Lei1,HU Zhi-mei1,ZHANG Ming1,XIA Heng-jian2,WANG Sheng-jun2,YE Li-chun3,4*,SHI Zhao-hua4,5*   

  1. 1School of Pharmacy,Hubei University of Chinese Medicine,Wuhan 430065,China;2Li-Shi-Zhen Pharmaceutical Group Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 435300,China;3School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hubei University of Chinese Medicine;4Hubei Shi-Zhen Laboratory;5Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine Resource and Compound Prescription,Hubei University of Chinese Medicine,Wuhan 430065,China
  • Online:2026-02-26 Published:2026-02-25

摘要:

研究夏枯草膏制备过程不同阶段关键物质量值传递规律,为夏枯草膏质量标准的建立提供参考。以15批夏枯草膏基准样品为研究对象,利用UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS技术进行全成分分析,建立夏枯草膏基准样品的HPLC指纹图谱,并结合化学计量学分析,筛选造成不同批次夏枯草膏基准样品质量差异的主要化学成分,同时借助成分分析及对照品比对筛选出共有成分,建立共有成分的含量测定方法,并计算转移率。结果表明,从夏枯草及其提取液、流浸膏、膏中鉴定出86种化合物,指纹图谱中共标定18个共有峰,指认出丹参素、原儿茶酸、咖啡酸、芦丁、金丝桃苷、异迷迭香酸苷、迷迭香酸、木犀草素8种成分;化学模式识别将基准样品归为4类,筛选出8种质量差异成分。夏枯草-膏传递过程中各成分转移率的比较,除咖啡酸、木犀草素外,其余6个成分的转移率均较稳定,而咖啡酸,木犀草素的平均转移率较低,在传递过程损失较大,自夏枯草至夏枯草膏传递保留较差。本研究以成分解析、出膏率、指纹图谱、化学计量学分析及多指标成分含量测定相结合的评价模式,对夏枯草膏基准样品的量值传递过程进行分析,为夏枯草膏的质量控制与评价提供参考。

关键词: 夏枯草膏, 基准样品, UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS, 指纹图谱, 量值传递

Abstract:

This study aims to investigate the transfer of key substance at different stages of the preparation process of Prunellae Spica ointment, providing a reference for the establishment of quality standards for Prunellae Spica ointment. Using 15 batches of Prunellae Spica paste benchmark samples as the research objects, a comprehensive component analysis was conducted using UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS technology. The HPLC fingerprint of the reference samples was established, and chemometric analysis was employed to screen the main chemical components responsible for quality differences among different batches of Prunellae Spica ointment benchmark samples. Additionally, by combining component analysis and reference standard comparison, common components were identified, and a method for determining the content of these common components was developed. The transfer rates of these components were also calculated.The results indicated that 86 compounds were identified from Prunellae Spica and extraction solution, fluid extract,ointment. In the fingerprint, 18 common peaks were labeled, and 8 components were identified, including salvianic acid A, protocatechuic acid, caffeic acid, rutin, hyperoside, salviaflaside, rosmarinic acid, and luteolin. Chemometric analysis classified the reference samples into 4 categories, and 8 components contributing to quality differences were screened out. During the transfer process from Prunellae Spica to ointment, the transfer rates of the components were relatively stable except for caffeic acid and luteolin, which exhibited lower average transfer rates and significant losses during the process, indicating poor retention from Prunellae Spica to ointment. This study analyzed the transfer patterns of the reference samples of Prunellae Spica ointment by integrating component analysis, paste yield, fingerprint, chemometric analysis, and multi-component content determination, providing a reference for the quality control and evaluation of Prunellae Spica ointment.

Key words: Prunellae Spica ointment, benchmark samples, UHPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS, fingerprint, quantitative value transfer

中图分类号:  R282.4